Square's S-1: Of Ratchets and Unicorn Valuations
Shriram Bhashyam | November 11, 2015
I recently wrote an article for TechCrunch on Square's IPO filing, a (not so little) investment protection known as a ratchet, and larger implications for how to think about Unicorn valuations. We often read about tech companies raising increasingly larger rounds at increasingly lofty valuations. Square's IPO filing, which is publicly available, gives us a peek into the details around private fundraises and the protections VCs get in these deals.
My article is excerpted below:
Over the last 18 months, those of us following the venture and startup space have gone on a rollercoaster ride of mega rounds, Unicorns, sky-high valuations, and bubble fears. Look beyond the hyperbolic headlines and you’ll see that there is more than meets the eye to that shiny new Unicorn valuation. Square’s recent IPO registration statement provides an opportunity to peel the onion on Unicorn valuations (i.e., valuations of $1 billion or greater).
little more than a year ago, Square raised a $150 million Series E round at a reported
$6 billion valuation. The round was led by the Government of Singapore
Investment Corporation, with participation from Rizvi Traverse and Goldman
Sachs. What we didn’t know then, that we know now, thanks to the S-1 filing, is
that the Series E investors had an IPO protection in place known as a ratchet.
A ratchet, in this context, provides that if the IPO price does not meet a
certain level, say at least the price paid by the investor in the private round
or some baked in rate of return above that price, the IPO conversion of those
shares to common shares is adjusted such that an additional number of shares
are issued to investors which would meet the predetermined level.
know--that wasn’t easy to follow. But Square’s ratchet will bring the abstract
to reality. A quick aside on venture investments. Venture investors are
typically issued preferred stock that converts to common shares, based on a
given formula, in the event of an IPO. From Square’s S-1, we know that its
Series E investors paid $15.46 per share for Series E Preferred Stock. The
ratchet in Square’s Series E provides that if the IPO price is less than $18.56
per share, the IPO conversion formula is adjusted such that the Series E
investors would receive a number of common shares equivalent to a number if the
IPO price had been $18.56. What does this mean? Square’s Series E investors
were guaranteed a 20% return in an IPO. On November 6, 2015, Square announced
that it expects to price its IPO between $11 and $13 per share. If the IPO were
to price in the midpoint of the range ($12 per share), the Series E investors
would be issued approximately an additional 5.3 million shares—or $63.6 million
of value—under the ratchet in order to achieve the guaranteed return.
is not alone in providing its investors with protective provisions like a
ratchet. Box had a similar ratchet
in place. It’s increasingly common in mega rounds to build in protections such
as IPO ratchets. It’s a sort of win/win for companies and investors. Companies
get their shiny Unicorn valuation (which helps with recruiting, in addition to
being the vanity metric du jour), and
investors get some downside protections, which can even guarantee a minimum
return, as in Square’s case. In fact, the law firm Fenwick & West LLP
studied venture-backed companies that raised at Unicorn valuations in the
twelve months trailing March 31, 2015. That study found that 30% of
venture-backed companies that raised capital at Unicorn valuations provided IPO
protections in the form of a ratchet.
are other protective provisions being given by companies, which indicate that
Unicorn valuations come with plenty of fine print. In addition to IPO
protections, like the ratchet, late stage investors bestowing Unicorn
valuations are also receiving acquisition protections. While the 1X liquidation
preference is standard, the Fenwick & West study reveals that 19% of
financings analyzed included senior liquidation preferences for the investors
in the latest round over other series of preferred stock (in simpler terms: last
money in, first money out).
Additionally, issuance of participating preferred stock is on the rise,
having been issued in 5% of deals in the Fenwick & West study.
Participation rights afford its holder a claim to not only the liquidation
preference in an acquisition, but also a pro rata share (on an as-converted
basis) of proceeds due to common holders. This “double-dip” was common in the following
the dot-com bubble, but had disappeared in the recent bull-run in VC. These
elaborate provisions give investors in Unicorn financings (i.e., the Big Boys)
significantly more downside protection than public company common stock
The salient point here is that Unicorn
valuations often come with asterisks. One may argue that following its Series E
round, Square was actually not worth $6 billion (prominent VCs have recently
debated this point on Twitter)...
Back to blog homepage